ARTICLE
31 August 2026

The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Uterine Contraction Pain Induced by Breastfeeding in Women Undergoing Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Study 

Yaqiu Guo1 Xin Wang2 Luyao Yang1 Qingling Ma1 Yunting Pang1 Yanan Liang1*
Show Less
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
2 Department of Anesthesiology, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250000, Shandong, China
AOGR 2026 , 4(3), 18–26; https://doi.org/10.26689/AOGR.v4i3.15221
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Postpartum uterine contraction pain (afterpains) is common after vaginal delivery and often worsens during breastfeeding, which may adversely affect rest, mood, and breastfeeding experience. Safe and breastfeeding-friendly nonpharmacological analgesic options are needed. This study evaluated the analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on breastfeeding-evoked uterine contraction pain after vaginal delivery. Patients and Methods: In this parallel-group clinical trial, women after vaginal delivery were assigned to a TEAS group (T, n = 92) or a control group (C, n = 97). Pain intensity was assessed using a 0–100 mm numerical rating scale (NRS) at the first breastfeeding session within 24 hours postpartum (pre-feeding baseline, and 5 and 10 minutes after latch). Secondary outcomes included the number of days with breastfeeding-related pain > 40 mm (NRS > 40), 24-hour postpartum blood loss, analgesia satisfaction (1–5), and adverse events. Between-group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Results: Baseline and peripartum characteristics were largely comparable; however, the third stage of labor and breastfeeding frequency within 24 hours differed statistically between groups (P = 0.001 and P = 0.031, respectively). Pre-feeding pain did not differ significantly between groups (43.0 [41.0–45.0] vs 42.0 [40.0–43.0], P = 0.153). At 5 minutes after latch, pain was lower in the TEAS group than in controls (65.0 [59.0–68.0] vs 68.0 [59.0–68.0], P < 0.001), while no difference was observed at 10 minutes after latch (52.5 [46.0–55.0] vs 55.0 [46.0–55.0], P = 0.365). The number of days with NRS > 40 was similar between groups (3.0 [3.0–4.0] vs 4.0 [3.0–5.0], P = 0.516). There were no significant differences in 24-hour blood loss (P = 0.365) or analgesia satisfaction (P = 0.516). Adverse events were rare (2.2% vs 0%, P = 0.236). Conclusion: TEAS significantly reduced breastfeeding-evoked uterine contraction pain at 5 minutes after latch during the first breastfeeding session within 24 hours postpartum, but the effect was not sustained at 10 minutes and did not reduce the overall burden of moderate-to-severe breastfeeding-related pain days. Further studies with adjustment for breastfeeding frequency and other potential confounders are warranted.

Keywords
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation
Breastfeeding
Postpartum afterpains
Uterine contraction
Funding
Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Shandong Maternal and Child Health Care Association (Project No.: SFYXH-2023Y026); Science and Technology Development Program of Jinan Municipal Health Commission (Project No.: 2024202006); Jinan Science and Technology Plan Project (Project No.:202328019)
References

[1]   An M, Zhao N, Lei X, et al., 2023, Clinical Study on Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined With Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Labor Analgesia. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 48(4): 439–443.

[2]   Huang L, Gu P, Huang T, et al., 2024, Study on the Analgesic Effect and Mechanism of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined With Conventional Analgesia on Post-Abortion Uterine Contraction Pain. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 24(12): 2293–2297.

[3]   Chang C, Jin Q, Zhu C, et al., 2025, Effects of Press Needles Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Labor Process and Labor Pain in Women With Singleton Term Pregnancy. Chinese Journal of Physicians, 27(7): 1078–1081.

[4]   Jia X, Yang M, Zheng B, et al., 2023, Clinical Observation of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation in the Treatment of Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 42(1): 24–29.

[5]   Shi C, Wang R, Sun Q, et al., 2022, Clinical Observation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Combined With Thunder-Fire Moxibustion in the Treatment of Postpartum Body Pain. Guangming Traditional Chinese Medicine, 37(10): 1818–1821.

[6]   Zhang L, Bai N, Yue W, 2022, Clinical Effect of Moxibustion Along Meridians Combined With Low-Frequency Pulsed Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain. Clinical Research and Practice, 7(22): 121–124.

[7]   Zheng S, Gui J, Jiang Y, 2024, Clinical Study on Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined With Foot Bath in the Treatment of Cold Coagulation and Blood Stasis Type Postpartum Body Pain. New Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 56(13): 177–182.

[8]   Liu J, Gao Z, Cai X, et al., 2022, Study on Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation Combined With Thunder-Fire Moxibustion in the Treatment of Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain. Jiangxi Medical Journal, 57(5): 472–474.

[9]   Zhang J, Wang A, Shi C, et al., 2022, Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Combined With Thunder-Fire Moxibustion in the Treatment of Postpartum Body Pain. Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases, 28(3): 98–101.

[10] Zhang L, Yang Z, Yang Q, et al., 2021, Exploration of the Effect of Acupoint Electromyographic Biofeedback Therapy on Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain in Multiparous Women. Chinese Journal of Family Planning and Gynecology, 13(8): 56–59.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top