ARTICLE

Volume 10,Issue 8

Cite this article
1
Download
1
Citations
3
Views
6 August 2026
AI-Supported Project-Based Learning Reform for the Data Structures Course under the “Less Teaching, More Learning” Philosophy
Xiaoxia Pu Junli Zhang
Show Less
1 School of Data Science, Eurasia University, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China,
2 School of Data Science, Eurasia University, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China,
JCER 2026 , 10(7), 161–166; https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v10i7.15752
© 2026 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study proposes an AI-supported project-based learning (PBL) framework for the Data Structures course under the Less Teaching, More Learning philosophy. The traditional chapter-based curriculum was reconstructed into eight authentic Python projects supported by the learning activity management system and a large language model-based AI teaching assistant. A controlled teaching experiment involving two undergraduate classes was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results indicate that the AI-supported PBL model significantly improved students’ academic performance, programming competence, and self-directed learning compared with conventional instruction. The proposed framework provides a practical and transferable paradigm for AI-enabled curriculum reform in computer science education.

References
Guo P, Saab N, Post LS, et al., 2020, A Review of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102: 101586.
Dalziel J, 2003, Implementing Learning Design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). In: Proceedings of the 20th ASCILITE Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 593–596.
Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, et al., 2020, Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33: 1877–1901.
Crompton H, Burke D, 2023, Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The State of the Field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1): 22.
Li Z, Wang Z, Wang W, et al., 2025, Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Educational Application: A Systematic Survey. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8: 100417.
Mullins EA, Portillo A, Ruiz-Rohena K, et al., 2024, Enhancing Classroom Teaching with LLMs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGITE Conference 2024, 237–243.
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al., 2019, Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education: Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16: 39.
Cotton DRE, Cotton PA, Shipway JR, 2023, Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2): 228–239.
Share
Back to top