ARTICLE
31 August 2026

Construction and Practice of a Three-Tiered Hierarchical Full-Chain Management System for Teaching Faculty in Standardized Residency Training

Chen Cheng1 Jinmei Chen1 Xin Li1 Yunfeng Diao1
Show Less
1 Resident Training Office of Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, 220 Chenglin Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300162, China
JCER 2026 , 10(8), 280–290; https://doi.org/10.26689/JCER.v10i8.15212
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: Faculty development is a critical component in the management of standardized residency training (SRT). In response to prominent issues at our institution—including imbalanced faculty echelon structure, unequal distribution of teaching loads, undifferentiated evaluation and incentives, and weaknesses in research-teaching integration—we constructed a three-tiered hierarchical full-chain faculty management system (primary reserve, backbone execution, and senior leadership) tailored to the characteristics of each specialty base. This system aims to establish a standardized and actionable operational mechanism for faculty cultivation, assessment, and incentive. Methods: Based on a full-coverage survey of SRT teaching faculty from September 2024 to September 2025, we analyzed the composition of the teaching staff, teaching activity implementation, faculty evaluations, and self-assessments. Drawing also on the faculty management experience of several high-performing SRT institutions, we developed a hierarchical evaluation system for SRT teaching faculty and established an integrated six-dimensional hierarchical management framework covering access, performance, training, assessment, incentive, and dynamic exit. Results: We completed the full-process institutional design grounded in the actual pain points identified in our survey. Differentiated rights, responsibilities, assessment indicators, and incentive standards were defined for the three faculty tiers, with specialty-specific provisions precisely addressing discipline-based issues, resulting in a complete implementation plan tailored to our hospital’s realities. Conclusion: This hierarchical management system meets the differentiated management needs of multi-specialty SRT bases. It can be used for long-term standardized faculty governance at our institution and serves as a reference for similar comprehensive hospitals seeking to resolve challenges in homogenized faculty management through tiered system design.

Keywords
Standardized residency training
Teaching faculty
Hierarchical management
Teaching incentives
Faculty echelon
Funding
Teaching Project of Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force (Grant No. WJTYZP202403)
References

[1] National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, 2022, Content and Standards for Standardized Residency Training (2022 Edition), Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House.

[2] Zhang W, Li D, Yu Q, et al., 2025, Exploration and Practice of Hierarchical Faculty Management System in Standardized Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 9(04): 267–272.

[3] Chen L, Wang Y, Lu J, et al., 2026, Construction of Competency‑Based Progressive Stratified Teaching Model for Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 10(4): 242–247.

[4] Chen S, Guo S, Yin Y, et al., 2025, Exploration of Faculty Team Building and Promotion Incentive Mechanisms in Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 45(05): 327–331.

[5] Qi D, Kan D, Tong Y, 2025, Construction of a Competency Model for Faculty in Standardized Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 24(10): 1335–1341.

[6] Yang W, Zhu X, Yan F, 2024, Reflections on Implementing the Progressive Stratification Concept in Standardized Residency Training at Radiology Bases. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 23(01): 94–99.

[7] Shao J, 2026, Application of CIPP Concept in the Evaluation and Management of Faculty in Laboratory Medicine Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 49(01): 112–117.

[8] Wu L, Xu Z, Tong Y, et al., 2024, Evaluation of a Teaching Capacity Improvement Program for Instructors at General Practice Community Training Bases Based on the CIPP Model. Chinese General Practice, 27(07): 801–809.

[9] Li M, Feng L, Xie J, et al., 2024, Construction and Practice of a Stratified Training System for Faculty in Standardized Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(06): 401–403.

[10] Gong T, Liu J, Li X, et al., 2023, Exploration of Progressive Stratification‑Based Online‑Offline Teaching in Radiology Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 43(8): 629–632.

[11] Zhang W, Yan X, Pan P, et al., 2021, Evaluation of the Application Effect of a Performance Assessment System for Supervising Physicians in Residency Training. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 41(01): 83–86.

[12] Wang K, Lü L, Zhang Y, et al., 2025, Practice and Exploration of Setting Up Full‑Time Teaching Management Positions in Residency Training Specialty Bases. China Modern Doctor, 63(29): 65–68.

[13] Zhang Z, Chen C, 2026, Teaching Workload Inequality and Temporal Patterns in Residency Training: A Gini Coefficient Analysis. Serican Journal of Medicine, 3(2): 25326.

[14] Srinivasan M, Li ST, Meyers FJ, et al., 2011, “Teaching as a Competency”: Core Competencies for Clinical Medical Educators. Academic Medicine, 86(10): 1211–1220.

Share
Back to top