Information Management in University Online Education: A Triadic Analysis

Online education has become a critical mode of instruction in Chinese universities, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines information management in online education through a triadic framework encompassing classroom information management, teaching effectiveness management, and teaching information management. Drawing on in-depth interviews with administrators, teachers, and students, the findings reveal three primary challenges in online education: the absence of embodied information, the uncontrollable nature of online platforms, and nonverbal overload caused by Zoom fatigue. Teachers face difficulties maintaining presence and interaction due to limited feedback from students and risks associated with class recordings. Students experience increased psychological and physical fatigue due to the overlap of learning and living spaces. Recommendations to address these issues include enhancing teacher-student interaction to foster a sense of presence, improving the transparency of course information to align expectations, and adopting user-friendly teaching platforms with privacy safeguards. These insights aim to improve the security, effectiveness, and experience of online education in higher education institutions.

References

CNNIC, 2023, 51st Statistical Report on Internet Development in China, viewed December 20, 2024, https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2023/0303/c88-10757.html

Ministry of Education, 2019, Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of Online Education, viewed December 20, 2024, https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5462518.htm

Ministry of Education, 2022, Several Opinions on Strengthening the Management of Online Open Course Teaching in General Higher Education Institutions, viewed December 20, 2024, https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-04/01/content_5682923.htm

Hu Y, 2012, Research on the Construction of an Online Teaching Platform for Literature Retrieval Based on Web 2.0, dissertation, Anhui University.

Ma X, Zhao G, Wu T, 2013, An Empirical Study on the Flipped Classroom Teaching of University Information Technology Public Courses. Journal of Distance Education, 31(01): 79–85.

Han L, Shi C, 2021, Research on Japanese Teaching Evaluation and Learning Outcomes Based on the SPOC Model. Foreign Language Research, 2021(05): 104–109.

Martin F, Sun T, Westine CD, 2020, A Systematic Review of Research on Online Teaching and Learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159: 104009.

Cai B, Lin Q, Liang G, et al., 2020, Research on the Transformation of College Students’ Learning Methods in an Online Teaching Environment: Problems, Trends, and Development Paths. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 320(12): 140–144.

Xiang C, Chen X, Lu K, 2021, An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Online Teaching in Higher Education and its Influencing Factors. China University Teaching, 2021(Z1): 93–99.

Li S, Wang Z, Yu C, et al., 2016, A Framework and Measurement Indicators for Analyzing Engagement in Online Learning Behavior: A Study Based on LMS Data. Open Education Research, 22(02): 77–88.

Wu D, Li W, 2020, The Phased Characteristics of Large-Scale Online Teaching in Chinese Universities: An Empirical Study Based on Surveys of Students, Teachers, and Academic Staff. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 38(07): 1–30.

Wang W, Yan H, Huang X, 2021, How Far is OMO Teaching? Overcoming Challenges in Online Teaching Through Teachers’ Self-Efficacy. Modern Distance Education, 193(01): 48–55.

Chen W, Cao H, 2020, Implementation Status and Reflections on Online Teaching in “Double First-Class” Universities. Education Science, 36(02): 24–30.

Guo L, Hu H, 2022, The Relationship Between Teacher Care and College Students’ Learning Satisfaction in Online Teaching: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement. Contemporary Education Forum, 308(02): 42–50.

Li S, Yu C, 2015, Development and Application of an Evaluation Scale for Distance Students’ Learning Engagement. Open Education Research, 21(06): 62–70 + 103.

Song J, Feng J, Qu K, 2020, The Impact of Teacher-Student Interaction on Deep Learning in Online Teaching. China Educational Technology, 406(11): 60–66.

Shen Z, Wu D, 2020, Exploring Factors Influencing the Effectiveness and Satisfaction of College Students’ Online Learning: An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling. Research on Educational Development, 40(11): 25–36 + 59.

Zhang Q, Wang A, 2014, Research on a New Hybrid Teaching Model Based on the “Flipped Classroom.” Modern Educational Technology, 24(04): 27–32.

Chen Y, Zheng Q, Sun H, et al., 2016, Modeling and Application of Online Learning Evaluation Based on Learning Analytics: A Study on the Teacher Comprehensive Evaluation Reference Model. E-education Research, 37(10): 35–41.

Liang S, Yang J, Zhang G, et al., 2018, Process Quality Monitoring of Teaching and Learning in Online Classrooms. Modern Educational Technology, 28(S1): 140–144.

Shu Y, Jiang Q, Zhao W, 2019, Precise Early Warning and Intervention in Online Learning Crises: Models and Empirical Research. China Distance Education, 535(08): 27–34 + 58 + 93.

Yang X, Jiang Q, Zhao W, et al., 2017, Diagnosis and Intervention of Online Learning Procrastination Based on Learning Analytics in the Era of Big Data. E-education Research, 38(07): 51–57.

Xiao Y, Wang J, 2020, Online Teaching Quality Evaluation System in Higher Education: Value Orientation and Construction Strategies. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 38(10): 141–144.

Thomas S, Sherry J, Chierichetti R, et al., 2022, Beyond Zoom Fatigue: Ritual and Resilience in Remote Meetings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2022(1): 56–73.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue