ARTICLE
4 August 2021
Anesthetic Effect of Compound Artevacaine Hydrochloride in Patients Undergoing Oral Implantation
Chengxi Chi Mengmeng Zhao Jiajing He Yanli Wang
Show Less
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Binzhou People’s Hospital, No.515 Huanghe 7 Road, Binzhou 256610, Shandong Province, China,
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Binzhou People’s Hospital, No.515 Huanghe 7 Road, Binzhou 256610, Shandong Province, China,
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Binzhou People’s Hospital, No.515 Huanghe 7 Road, Binzhou 256610, Shandong Province, China,
4 Department of Anesthesiology, Binzhou People’s Hospital, No.515 Huanghe 7 Road, Binzhou 256610, Shandong Province, China,
JCNR 2021 , 5(4), 220–224; https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v5i4.2373
© 2021 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: To investigate and analyze the anesthetic effect of compound artevacaine hydrochloride in patients undergoing oral implantation. Methods: In this study, 60 patients receiving oral implant surgery in our hospital were selected as the research subjects, and the operation time was from July 2019 to March 2021. Patients were randomly selected and divided into groups for the study. 30 patients receiving lidocaine hydrochloride anesthesia were used as the control group, and 30 patients receiving compound artevacaine hydrochloride anesthesia were used as the research group. The anesthetic effect and safety of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The anesthetic effect of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The blood pressure and heart rate in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups before anesthesia (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ADR between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: For patients undergoing oral implant surgery, choosing compound artevacaine hydrochloride as anesthetic drug has obvious anesthetic effect and can stabilize patients' life indexes. The anesthetic effect is obvious, and there is no obvious adverse reaction, and the clinical value is obvious.

References
Lu J, Zhou X, Lantian O, 2020, Anesthetic Effect and Safety Analysis of Compound Artevacaine Hydrochloride in Patients Undergoing Oral Implantation. Chinese and Foreign Medical Sciences, 39(24): 102-104.
Jia L, 2017, Anesthetic Effect of Compound Artevacaine in Patients Undergoing Oral Implantation and its Effect on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate. China Modern Drug Application, 11(5): 17-19.
Xu J, Li B, 2017, Anesthetic Effect and Safety Analysis of Compound Artevacaine in Patients Undergoing Oral Implantation. Strait Pharmacy, 29(11):88-90.
Radosaw L, Serge B, Jacques M, et al., 2020, Peri-Procedural Management, Implantation Feasibility, and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Leadless Pacemakers: European Snapshot Survey. EP Europace, (5):5.
Tan Z, Zhang J, Dong Y, 2018, Anesthetic Effect of Compound Artevacaine in Patients Undergoing Oral Implantation and its Effect on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate. Clinical Research & Practice, 3(15): 81-82.
Share
Back to top