Exploration of the Application of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Nursing of Cardiac Arrest

© 2025 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a major global public health challenge, and its high morbidity and low survival rate pose severe tests for emergency and critical care. Although modern CPR techniques significantly improve the immediate resuscitation success rate in CA patients, poor outcomes such as neurological impairment still significantly increase the long-term care burden and reduce the quality of survival. In recent years, the application of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has attracted much attention in the field of cardiac arrest through its unique myocardial-nerve dual protection mechanism against the heart. This paper summarizes the conceptual connotation, physiological mechanism, operation method, and its application progress in CA and explores the potential of this technology in the field of CA care in order to provide reference for the research and application of RIC in the field of emergency care.

References

Ait Hssain A, Chalkias A, Vahedian-Azimi A, et al., 2025, Survival Rates with Favorable Neurological Outcomes After In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Prospective Cohort Study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 87: 103889.

Secher N, Adelborg K, Szentkúti P, et al., 2022, Evaluation of Neurologic and Psychiatric Outcomes After Hospital Discharge Among Adult Survivors of Cardiac Arrest. JAMA Netw Open, 5(5): e2213546.

Bartlett E, Morse SC, Morse D, et al., 2024, Randomized Feasibility Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Resuscitation (RICE). Resuscitation, 195.

Saccaro LF, Aimo A, Emdin M, et al., 2021, Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: Similarities and Differences. Front Neurol, 12: 716316.

Incognito AV, Millar PJ, Pyle WG, 2021, Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in COVID-19. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 320(3): L331–L338.

Yan MY, Liu JM, Wu J, et al., 2024, Impact of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Acute Ischemic Stroke in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Syst Rev, 13(1): 141.

Zhao W, Li S, Ren C, et al., 2019, Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Stroke: Clinical Data, Challenges, and Future Directions. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 6(1): 186–196.

Hausenloy DJ, Barrabes JA, Botker HE, et al., 2016, Ischaemic Conditioning and Targeting Reperfusion Injury: A 30-Year Voyage of Discovery. Basic Res Cardiol, 111(6): 70.

Totzeck M, Hendgen-Cotta U, Rassaf T, 2015, Concepts of Hypoxic NO Signaling in Remote Ischemic Preconditioning. World J Cardiol, 7(10): 645–651.

Liu ZJ, Chen C, Li XR, et al., 2016, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning-Mediated Neuroprotection against Stroke is Associated with Significant Alterations in Peripheral Immune Responses. CNS Neurosci Ther, 22(1): 43–52.

Sun YY, Zhu HJ, Zhao RY, et al., 2023, Remote Ischemic Conditioning Attenuates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation via the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway in MCAO Mice. Redox Biol, 66: 102852.

Yu Y, Zhou H, Xiong Y, et al., 2020, Exosomal miR-199a-5p Derived from Endothelial Cells Attenuates Apoptosis and Inflammation in Neural Cells by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Brain Res, 1726: 146515.

Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM, 2010, The Second Window of Preconditioning (SWOP) Where Are We Now? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 24(3): 235–254.

Li S, Xing X, Wang L, et al., 2024, Remote Ischemic Conditioning Reduces Adverse Events in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care, 28(1): 5.

Zhao W, Hausenloy DJ, Hess DC, et al., 2023, Remote Ischemic Conditioning: Challenges and Opportunities. Stroke, 54(8): 2204–2207.

Randhawa PK, Bali A, Jaggi AS, 2015, RIPC for Multiorgan Salvage in Clinical Settings: Evolution of Concept, Evidence and Mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol, 746: 317–332.

Zhu Y, Li X, Lei X, et al., 2025, The Potential Mechanism and Clinical Application Value of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Stroke. Neural Regen Res, 20(6): 1613–1627.

Barros AJ, Enfield KB, 2023, In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 41(3): 455–464.

Lazzarin T, Tonon CR, Martins D, et al., 2022, Post-Cardiac Arrest: Mechanisms, Management, and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med, 12(1).

Zumbrunn SK, Blatter R, Bissmann B, et al., 2025, The Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest: Evidence on the Short- and Long-Term Course. Dtsch Arztebl Int, (Forthcoming).

Kovoort JG, Jerrow R, Cork S, et al., 2025, Gaps in Public Access Defibrillation: Analysis of International Legislation. JACC Adv, 4(2): 101573.

Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ, 2007, Myocardial Reperfusion Injury. N Engl J Med, 357(11): 1121–1135.

Myat A, Song KJ, Rea T, 2018, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Current Concepts. The Lancet, 391(10124): 970–979.

Cour M, Buisson M, Klouche K, et al., 2019, Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Septic Shock (RECO-Sepsis): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials, 20(1): 281.

Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM, 2016, Ischaemic Conditioning and Reperfusion Injury. Nat Rev Cardiol, 13(4): 193–209.

Cho YJ, Kim WH, 2019, Perioperative Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning. Int J Mol Sci, 20(19): 4839.

Zhang H, Hu H, Zhai C, et al., 2024, Cardioprotective Strategies After Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 24(1): 5–18.

Huang Y, Gao X, Zhou X, et al., 2021, Remote Ischemic Postconditioning Inhibited Mitophagy to Achieve Neuroprotective Effects in the Rat Model of Cardiac Arrest. Neurochem Res, 46(3): 573–583.

Donato M, Evelson P, Gelpi RJ, 2017, Protecting the Heart from Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: An Update on Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Postconditioning. Curr Opin Cardiol, 32(6): 784–790.

Fujita M, Asanuma H, Hirata A, et al., 2007, Prolonged Transient Acidosis During Early Reperfusion Contributes to the Cardioprotective Effects of Postconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 292(4): H2004–H2008.

Xu J, Sun S, Lu X, et al., 2015, Remote Ischemic Pre- and Postconditioning Improve Postresuscitation Myocardial and Cerebral Function in a Rat Model of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation. Crit Care Med, 43(1): e12–e18.

Ho AFW, Chong J, Ong MEH, et al., 2020, Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Emergency Medicine—Clinical Frontiers and Research Opportunities. Shock, 53(3): 269–276.

Albrecht M, Meybohm P, Broch O, et al., 2015, Evaluation of Remote Ischaemic Post-Conditioning in a Pig Model of Cardiac Arrest: A Pilot Study. Resuscitation, 93: 89–95.

Wang Z, Wu L, Xu J, et al., 2020, Limb Ischemic Postconditioning Alleviates Postcardiac Arrest Syndrome Through the Inhibition of Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Opening in a Porcine Model. Biomed Res Int, 2020: 9136097.

Fan R, Yu T, Lin JL, et al., 2016, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Post-Resuscitation Cerebral Function via Overexpressing Neuroglobin After Cardiac Arrest in Rats. Brain Res, 1648(Pt A): 345–355.

Dave KR, Saul I, Prado R, et al., 2006, Remote Organ Ischemic Preconditioning Protects Brain from Ischemic Damage Following Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest. Neurosci Lett, 404(1-2): 170–175.

Hausenloy DJ, Ntsekhe M, Yellon DM, 2020, A Future for Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in High-Risk Patients. Basic Res Cardiol, 115(3): 35.

Cheskes S, Koh M, Turner L, et al., 2020, Field Implementation of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The FIRST Study. Can J Cardiol, 36(8): 1278–1288.

Kleinbongard P, Gedik N, Kirca M, et al., 2018, Mitochondrial and Contractile Function of Human Right Atrial Tissue in Response to Remote Ischemic Conditioning. J Am Heart Assoc, 7(15): e009540.

Pico F, Lapergue B, Ferrigno M, et al., 2020, Effect of In-Hospital Remote Ischemic Perconditioning on Brain Infarction Growth and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The RESCUE BRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol, 77(6): 725–734.

Asadi M, Hooshmandi E, Emaminia F, et al., 2022, Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients with Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Before Carotid Artery Stenting: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized Controlled Trial. Curr J Neurol, 21(2): 119–124.

Zahariev T, Anastassov V, Girov K, et al., 2009, Prevalence of Primary Chronic Venous Disease: The Bulgarian Experience. Int Angiol, 28(4): 303–310.

Chen HS, Cui Y, Li XQ, et al., 2022, Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning vs Usual Care on Neurologic Function in Patients with Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke: The RICAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 328(7): 627–636.

An JQ, Cheng YW, Guo YC, et al., 2020, Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning After Thrombolysis in Patients with Stroke. Neurology, 95(24): e3355–e3363.

Kleinbongard P, Skyschally A, Heusch G, 2017, Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Signal Transduction. Pflugers Arch, 469(2): 159–181.

Abe T, Morita K, Shinohara G, et al., 2017, Synergistic Effects of Remote Perconditioning with Terminal Blood Cardioplegia in an In Vivo Piglet Model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 52(3): 479–484.

Xie B, Gao X, Huang Y, et al., 2021, Remote Ischemic Postconditioning Inhibits Hippocampal Neuronal Apoptosis and Mitophagy After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Rats. Shock, 55(1): 74–82.

Geng X, Wang Q, Lee H, et al., 2025, Correction: Remote Ischemic Postconditioning vs. Physical Exercise After Stroke: An Alternative Rehabilitation Strategy? Mol Neurobiol, (Forthcoming).

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue