ARTICLE
21 May 2026
Deep Learning Prediction Model for Dynamic Response of Bridge Cranes
Guanlan Li Zhaoqing Guan Qiang Liu Wenqing Yang Siqun Ma
Show Less
1 Zhan Tianyou College of Dalian Jiaotong University(CRRC College), Dalian 116028, Liaoning, China,
2 1Zhan Tianyou College of Dalian Jiaotong University(CRRC College), Dalian 116028, Liaoning, China,
3 Yantai Vocational College of Automotive Engineering, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China,
4 Zhengzhou Depot of China Railway Zhengzhou Group Co., Ltd. Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China,
JERA 2026 , 10(4), 69–79; https://doi.org/10.26689/jera.v10i4.14894
© 2026 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

The transient dynamic response of a bridge crane’s lifting mechanism is critical for operational safety and structural fatigue life. While traditional multi-body dynamics simulations offer high fidelity, their substantial computational cost hinders real-time analysis in digital twin applications. To overcome this bottleneck, this paper proposes a deep learning surrogate model based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for rapid prediction of the transient dynamics in a double-girder bridge crane’s lifting system. First, a high-fidelity dynamic benchmark model incorporating wire rope flexibility and contact friction is developed in ADAMS. Second, a high-quality dataset of 400 samples is constructed via Latin Hypercube Sampling, covering variations in load, lifting height, speed, and acceleration. Third, a three-layer encoder-LSTM-decoder network is designed and trained using a cosine annealing learning rate schedule and the AdamW optimizer. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves excellent prediction accuracy, with a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of 0.0431, a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.0681, and an average peak relative error of 4.72%, meeting engineering requirements. Most notably, the prediction time is reduced from approximately 30 minutes per simulation to 300 milliseconds, representing a computational efficiency improvement by a factor of about 6000 compared to conventional dynamic simulation.

References
Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Zhao C, et al., 2025, A Fast Calculation Method for Electromagnetic Field based on Deep Operator Network. High Voltage Engineering, 51(3): 1484–1494.
Liu F, Chen H, 2025, Response Study of Tower Crane and Elastic Plate under Dynamic Complicated Excitation. PLoS One, 20(6): e0324745.
Sun J, Ke D, Xu J, et al., 2026, A PINN-DDPG Fusion Evaluation Method for Dynamic Regulation Potential of Building Thermal Load, Proceedings of the CSEE, 1–12.
Chen J, Hao X, Yu Q, 2012, Dynamic Analysis of Parallel Mechanism with Clearance Joints. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 33(1): 98–101.
Feng L, Wang J, Liu F, et al., 2018, Dynamic Simulation of Edge Loading Caused by Separation of Ceramic Hip Joint Ball Head and Acetabular Cup. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 22(7): 985–990.
Share
Back to top