Research on Electronic Forensics Based on Blockchain Technology

© 2024 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

The development of high technology, for public life to provide a justification at the same time, also encouraged the spirit of cybercrime, to become more and more rampant. In network crime, electronic data is usually used as the main evidence to determine the facts of the crime and plays an important role in the smooth trial of the case. But because electronic data on dependent, concealment, easy destructive strong science and technology, the forensics work is now in trouble. The mature use of blockchain technology can avoid existing problems to a certain extent, which is helpful to the smooth progress of electronic forensics. This paper on electronic evidence how to more effectively, combined with research blockchain technology, improve the efficiency of electronic evidence collection work.

References

Long Z, 2017, Seeking the Balance Between Effective Evidence Collection and Ensuring Rights: Comment on “Two High and One” Electronic Data Evidence Regulations. China Procurators, 2017(1): 78.

Zhao C, Cui L, 2017, Research on the Difficulties of Electronic Data Search and Seizure. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2017(3): 21–26.

Wu M, Zhuang M, 2018, Chain Block Access Card Technology in the Application of Internet Financial Crime Governance. People’s Procuratorate, 2018(22): 51–54.

Li J, 2019, Internet Court, and the Present Situation of Blockchain Forensic Research. Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College, 29(3): 13–18.

Chen H, Xu J, Shi X, et al., 2021, Study on Several Nodes in Network Crime Procedure. People’s Procuratorate, 2021(10): 28–32.

Li R, Chen X, 2024, Innovative Digital Law Enforcement, “Wisdom” and “Efficiency” Platform, and Application of Standard Case Handling: The Establishment of “Electronic Forensics Analysis Laboratory” by Hebei Hengshui Market Supervision and Administration Bureau. China Quality Journey, 2024(2): 20–21.

Zhao H, 2024, On the Conflict and Countermeasures Between American Cross-Border Electronic Forensics and China’s Data Security Legislation. Journal of Anhui University (Zheshe Edition), 48(1): 100–108.

Li Z, 2023, Practical Application of Multi-Angle Proof Method in Criminal Cases of Soft Copyright Infringement: Taking a Soft Copyright Infringement Case as an Example. Legal Expo, 2023(29): 9–12.

Chu X, 2023, Analysis and Thinking on Investigating and Dealing with the Illegal Advertisement Case of Lu’an Juming E-Commerce Through Its Own Online Store of Tmall. China Brand & Anti-Counterfeiting, 2023(9): 27–29.

Liu Y, Song B, 2023, Application of Blockchain Technology in Electronic Forensics Work. Network Security Technology and Application, 2023(6): 147–148.

Yao H, 2023, The Dilemma of Network Service Providers in Cross-Border Electronic Forensics: A Case Study of Chinese Banks. Journal of Hebei Public Security Police Vocational College, 23(1): 17–21.

Guo X, 2022, The Urgent Need to Strengthen the Legal Supervision of Cross-Border Electronic Evidence. People’s Procuratorial, 2022(S1): 17–20.

Tan M, Fan Q, 2012, Research on Key Technologies of Electronic Forensics in Online Pyramid Selling Cases. Cyberspace Security, 13(3): 35–39.

Wang Z, 2012, Construction of China’s Path for Cross-Border Electronic Forensics of Internet Gambling Crime. Journal of Henan Police College, 31(3): 31–38.

Lai Y, Wang Y, 2012, Current Situation, Predicament and Countermeasures of Electronic Forensics for the Crime of Helping Trust: An Empirical Analysis Based on 94 Judgment Documents. Journal of Shandong Police College, 34(2): 62–73.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue