ARTICLE
Volume 8,Issue 8
20 June 2022
Practice Theory in International Relations
Gang He
Show Less
1
Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, Center for Strategic and Security Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100037, China,
ssr 2022 , 4(6), 37–41;
https://doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4040
Abstract
This paper reviews the practice turn in the international relations studies, and the development of its related theories. This paper, particularly focuses on the use of practice theory from different perspectives, further proposed a new hypothesis for the practice theory. In the future, this research may provide an idea for the development of the practice theory.
References
Pouliot V, 2008, “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization, 62(2): 257-288.
Wendt A, 2000, Translated by Qin Yaqing, Social Theory of International Politics. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group, 231.
Neumann IB, 2002, “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3): 627-651.
Zhu L, Nie W, 2010, “The ‘Practical Turn’ in International Relations Theory,” in World Economy and Politics. 2010(8): 98-115.
Nissen RA, 2013, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge, 25.
Bourdieu P, 2003, Translated by Jiang Zhuahua, Le Sens Pratique. Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House, 80.
Nissen RA, 2013, “Introduction,” In Rebecca Adler-Nissen (eds.) Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge, 11.
Lave J, 2004, Translated by Wang Wenjing, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
Wenger E, 1999, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
Adler E, 2005, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. Routledge.
Latour B, Woolgar S, 2013, Laboratory Life. Princeton University Press.
Bueger C, Gadinger F, 2007, “Reassembling and Dissecting: International Relations Practice from a Science Studies Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives, 8(1): 90-110.
Mayer M, 2012, “Chaotic Climate Change and Security.” International Political Sociology, 6(2): 165-185.
Boltanski L, 2022, Love and Justice as Competences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thevenot L, 2007, “The Plurality of Cognitive Formats and Engagements: Moving between the Familiar and the Public.” European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3): 409-423.
Zhu LQ, 2011, China’s Participation in the International System: An Explanatory Model for Practice. Foreign Affairs Review, 2011(1): 19.
Wendt A, 1994, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review, 88(2): 384-396.
Giddens A, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Bhaskar R, 1979, The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester.
Archer MS, 1982, “Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.” The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4): 455-483.
Share
Back to top
Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.
We are committed to supporting the scientific community by publishing impactful research and fostering effective communication among scientists. We continuously seek ways to accelerate scientific progress while upholding transparency and open dialogue. Our goal is to make knowledge freely and barrier‑free accessible to all.
Contact us: info@bbwpublisher.com
Level 10, 50 Clarence Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia