ARTICLE
Volume 8,Issue 8
17 September 2025
A Comparative Study on Governance Models of World-class Scientific and Technological Societies and Their Enlightenment to China
Xianghui Liu
Show Less
1
School of Humanities & Social Sciences, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China,
ssr 2025 , 7(8), 220–227;
https://doi.org/10.26689/ssr.v7i8.12021
Abstract
This study comparatively analyzes governance models of scientific and technological societies across Anglo-Saxon, Continental European, and Oriental Hybrid framework, synthesizing critical external conditions for their emergence, common elements and indicator framework, internal governance and the success logic behind their effectiveness, benchmark samples and the driving forces for their vigorous development of world-class scientific and technological societies, while proposing constructive ideas for the actionable pathways of building world-class scientific and technological societies in China.
References
Sui LR, 2017, Research on the Management System of National Social Organizations, thesis, Dalian Maritime University.
Zheng DS, Hu M, 2015, Insights into the Operation and Management of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies: A Review of the Investigation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies. Society, 2015(8): 36–39.
Dees JG, 1998, Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship, thesis, Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business.
Wang SZ, Song CC, 2013, Independence or Autonomy: Reconsidering the Characteristics of Chinese Social Organizations. Chinese Social Sciences, 2013(5): 50–66.
Jiang N, Cai G, 2007, The International Association for Computer Science: The Development Path of a Scientific and Technological Society Centered on Enhancing Academic Driving Force. Society, 2007(8): 15–19.
Jun S, 2015, How Foreign Governments Support Scientific and Technological Societies in Carrying Out Social Services. Learning Times.
Wang P, Salamon LM, Simon C, et al., 2010, Outsourcing Government-financed Social Services to Civil Society Organizations: Lessons from China and Abroad. Peking University Press, Beijing, 202–206.
Salamon L, 2007, Global Civil Society: An International Index of the Nonprofit Sector, translated by Yimei Chen et al. Peking University Press, Beijing.
Jia XJ, Sun L, 2008, Discussion on the Index of Civil Society Measurement and Its Localization. China Nonprofit Review, 2(1): 74–90.
Fan LZ, 2003, Social Changes and Non-Governmental Organizations in the Context of Globalization. Shanghai People’s Publishing House, Shanghai, 377.
Han JF, Wang Z, 2015, The Definition and Types of Branch Organizations of National Societies. Society, 2015(8): 29–33.
ASAE & The Center for Association Leadership, 2011, 199 Ideas: Member Service and Engagement (pp. 48–51). ASAE, Washington, DC.
ASAE & The Center for Association Leadership, 2011, 199 Ideas: Member Service and Engagement (p. 8). ASAE, Washington, DC.
Share
Back to top
Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.
We are committed to supporting the scientific community by publishing impactful research and fostering effective communication among scientists. We continuously seek ways to accelerate scientific progress while upholding transparency and open dialogue. Our goal is to make knowledge freely and barrier‑free accessible to all.
Contact us: info@bbwpublisher.com
Level 10, 50 Clarence Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia