ARTICLE
11 March 2026
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine in Sedation of Neurosurgical Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Binbin Zhu Weilong Zhong
Show Less
1 Comprehensive ICU, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China,
2 Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, China,
JCNR 2026 , 10(2), 101–107; https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v10i2.14145
© 2026 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the incidence of delirium and clinical prognosis in patients with neurosurgical ICU. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that enrolled patients admitted to the Neurosurgery ICU of our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023 who required mechanical ventilation (duration > 48 hours). Based on sedation protocols, patients were divided into a dexmedetomidine group (DEX group, n = 60) and a midazolam routine sedation group (control group, n = 60). The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium during ICU stay, while secondary endpoints included mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay, 28-day mortality rate, and adverse events. Results: The incidence of delirium in the DEX group was significantly lower than that in the control group (31.7% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.004). Additionally, the duration of mechanical ventilation in the DEX group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(7.2 ± 2.5) days vs. (9.8 ± 3.4) days, p < 0.001], and the ICU stay was also significantly reduced [(13.5 ± 4.2) days vs. (16.8 ± 5.7) days, p = 0.002]. There were no statistically significant differences in the 28-day mortality rate (DEX group: 13.3% vs. control group: 16.7%, p = 0.59) or the rate of unintended extubation (DEX group: 3.3% vs. control group: 5.0%, p = 0.64) between the two groups. In terms of safety, the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the DEX group than in the control group (15.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: In neurosurgical patients on mechanical ventilation, dexmedetomidine sedation can effectively reduce the incidence of delirium and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, but the potential risk of bradycardia should be monitored.

References
Jakob S, Ruokonen E, Grounds R, et al., 2012, Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam or Propofol for Sedation During Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: Two Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA, 307(11): 1151–1160.
Shehabi Y, Howe B, Bellomo R, et al., 2019, Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(26): 2506–2517.
Flükiger J, Hollinger A, Speich B, et al., 2021, Dexmedetomidine for Reduction of ICU-Related Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Intensive Care Medicine, 47(9): 1023–1032.
Hu Y, Zhou H, Zhang H, et al., 2022, The Neuroprotective Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Its Mechanism. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13: 965661.
Wang D, Li R, Li S, et al., 2021, Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Brain Tumour Resections: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ Open, 11: e051584.
Pandharipande P, Sanders R, Girard T, et al., 2010, Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lorazepam on Outcome in Patients with Sepsis: An A Priori-Designed Analysis of the MENDS Randomized Controlled Trial. Critical Care, 14(2): R38.
Patel M, Bednarik J, Lee P, et al., 2018, Delirium Monitoring in Neurocritically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review. Critical Care Medicine, 46(11): 1832–1841.
Riker R, Shehabi Y, Bokesch P, et al., 2009, Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Trial. JAMA, 301(5): 489–499.
Share
Back to top