Volume 10,Issue 7
OmniBench is a widely used tri-modal (image–audio–text) benchmark containing 1,142 four-choice multiple-choice questions. We discover a severe answer-position skew in OmniBench: option D is correct 48.6% of the time (χ² = 384.34, p = 5.46×10⁻⁸³), nearly twice the expected 25%. To test whether this skew distorts evaluation outcomes, we design an option-shuffling experiment: keeping all question content unchanged, we randomly reassign letter labels so that the correct answer is uniformly distributed (D ≈ 25%), then re-evaluate the same models. Results show that accuracy changes significantly in two of three tested models after shuffling (up to 4.20%, p < 0.01), demonstrating that unequal answer distribution can significantly bias model evaluation outcomes. Furthermore, we propose a label-free content-scoring evaluation method based on conditional log-probability, which achieves distribution-invariant evaluation (accuracy difference ≤ 0.18%, p > 0.4).