Research on Project-based Learning Approach with Local Characteristics in Electronic and Information Science Courses

¹ Hubei Key Laboratory of Intelligent Vision-Based Monitoring for Hydroelectric Engineering, Yichang, Hubei, 443002, China; College of Computer and Information Technology, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China,

erd 2024 , 6(5), 204–209; https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v6i5.7330

© 2024 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

The promulgation of the outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035 has clarified the focus of work and put forward new requirements for the training of electronic and information science professionals. The teaching methods and levels can be optimized by focusing on the problems existing in the teaching process of electronic and information science courses, carrying out teaching reform, and putting forward the project-based learning approach with local characteristics.

References

Beem HR, Ampomah C, Takyi J, et al., 2023, Development of an Online Project-Based Learning Design Course for African First Year Students and its Impact on Self-Efficacy Levels. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(5): 410–420.

Li H, Gao R, 2023, Exploring the Efficacy of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Clinical Gastroenterology Education. Education Reform and Development, 5(1): 20–23.

Chen CH, Yang YC, 2019, Revisiting the Effects of Project-based Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis Investigating Moderators. Educational Research Review, 2019(26): 71–81.

Guo P, Saab N, Post LS, et al., 2020, A Review of Project-based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 2020(102): 101586.

Biazus MO, Mahtari S, 2022, The Impact of Project-based Learning (PjBL) Model on Secondary Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1): 38–48.

Cheng CC, Yang YTC, 2023, Impact of Smart Classrooms Combined with Student-centered Pedagogies on Rural Students’ Learning Outcomes: Pedagogy and Duration as Moderator Variables. Computers & Education, 2023(207): 104911.

Chen CH, Tsai CC, 2021, In-service Teachers’ Conceptions of Mobile Technology-integrated Instruction: Tendency towards Student-centered Learning. Computers & Education, 2021(170): 104224.

Perignat E, Katz-Buonincontro J, 2019, STEAM in Practice and Research: An Integrative Literature Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2019(31): 31–43

McDonald CV, 2016, STEM Education: A Review of the Contribution of the Disciplines of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4): 530–569.

Felder RM, Brent R, 2024, Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.

Meng Q, 2021, A Study on the Reform of College English Pragmatic Teaching Based on Mixed Teaching Methods. Education Reform and Development, 3(2): 65–69.

Lai CY, Cheung KY, Chan CS, 2023, Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation in ChatGPT Adoption to Support Active Learning: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2023(5): 100178.

Wu TT, Lee HY, Wang WS, et al., 2023, Leveraging Computer Vision for Adaptive Learning in STEM Education: Effect of Engagement and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1): 53.

Zhang X, Chen Y, Li D, et al., 2023, Engaging Young Students in Effective Robotics Education: An Embodied Learning-Based Computer Programming Approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2): 532–558.

Enoch SCY, Kong SC, 2024, A Deep Learning Framework with Visualisation for Uncovering Students’ Learning Progression and Learning Bottlenecks. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(1): 223–249.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue