Strategy Design for the Quality Monitoring System of Mechanical Majors Based on Engineering Education Professional Certification

© 2025 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

In response to the talent demands of engineering education professional certification for mechanical majors, this paper aims to cultivate applied and innovative talents and designs strategies for a teaching quality monitoring system. The strategies include the improvement of undergraduate talent training programs, the enhancement of theoretical classroom teaching quality, the improvement of practical course teaching quality, the enhancement of teachers’ professional and teaching abilities, and the design of a diversified assessment system for course teaching quality. These five monitoring subsystem strategies cover the main areas involved in teaching work, ensuring continuous improvement in talent training programs, course construction, practical links, teachers’ lecturing abilities, and teaching quality assessment. This system aims to continuously improve teaching quality and lay a foundation for the efforts to cultivate applied talents with solid theoretical knowledge, strong innovation capabilities, and practical skills.

References

Zheng W, Hao C, Guo L, et al., 2017, Analysis on the Practice Teaching Reform of Mining Engineering Under the Background of Engineering Education Accreditation. Education Teaching Forum, 2017(17): 158–159.

Zhang H, Kong X, Chang X, et al., 2024, Discussion on the Training Mode of Applied Chemical Engineering Talents Under the Background of Engineering Education. Chemical Engineering Design Communications, 50(2): 79–81.

Sun N, 2016, Current Situation and Prospect of Engineering Education Accreditation in China. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, 7(1): 29–34.

Zhu Y, Ye Y, 2009, Research on ABET Engineering Accreditation Criteria. Modern University Education, 2009(3): 46–50.

Luo Z, 2008, Engineering Education Accreditation and Its Impact on University Practice Teaching. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 27(6): 1–3.

Yao T, Wang H, She Y, 2014, Exploration of Engineering Education Accreditation in China: From the Perspective of the Washington Accord. University Education Science, 2014(6): 28–32.

Xu J, 2020, Construction of Teaching Quality Monitoring System for Electrical Automation in Higher Vocational Colleges Based on Engineering Education Accreditation. Occupation, 2020(32): 77–78.

Ma C, Chen H, Ri Z, et al., 2021, Construction of Monitoring and Evaluation System for Practical Teaching Quality of Mechatronics Under Emerging Engineering Education. Xinjiang Agricultural Mechanization, 2021(3): 45–46 + 48.

Cao R, Wu Y, Fu X, et al., 2020, Evaluation of Core-Course Teaching Quality for Automation Specialty Based on Engineering Education Accreditation. Education Teaching Forum, 2020(13): 86–87.

Pan C, Song X, Xiang J, 2022, Study on Teaching Quality Evaluation Criteria of “Mechanical Design” Course Based on Engineering Education Accreditation. Heilongjiang Education (Higher Education Research & Appraisal), 2022(5): 29–30.

Huang Y, Lu H, 2022, Continuous Improvement of Undergraduate Teaching Quality Based on Accreditation: A Case Study of Automation Specialty in Anhui Polytechnic University. Science & Technology Vision, 2022(9): 108–110.

Mei Y, 2022, Analysis of Teaching Quality Standards for Manufacturing Equipment Courses. Electronic Technology, 51(5): 97–99.

Bansal S, Bansal A, Dalrymple O, 2015, Outcome-Based Education Model for Computer Science Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 28(2): 113–121.

Gong J, Sun J, 2020, Construction of an Evaluative Teaching Quality Monitoring Mechanism. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 39(12): 171–173.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue