Strategies for Promoting Interdisciplinary Integration Through Master Teachers’ Studios

© 2026 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

Against the background of key-competency-oriented education reform, interdisciplinary integration has become an important approach to breaking disciplinary barriers and improving education quality. As a key carrier for teachers’ professional development, Master Teachers’ Studios feature multiple advantages, including resource aggregation, demonstration leadership, and teaching-research innovation, making them an important force in advancing the implementation of interdisciplinary integration. Based on senior high school teaching practice, this paper systematically constructs strategies for promoting interdisciplinary integration through Master Teachers’ Studios from seven dimensions: top-level design, teaching-research models, curriculum development, platform support, project leadership, evaluation reform, and team development. It provides theoretical references and practical pathways for regional high-quality education development, teachers’ professional growth, and the cultivation of students’ core competencies.

References

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, General High School Curriculum Plan (2017 Edition, 2020 Revision). People’s Education Press, Beijing.

Cui Y, 2018, Reform of Teaching Paradigm for Disciplinary Core Competencies. Research in Educational Development, 38(20): 18–23.

Zhang H, 2016, On the Connotation of Core Competencies and Curriculum Logic. Global Education, 45(04): 10–24.

Ye L, 2001, New Exploration of Teacher Roles and Teacher Development. Educational Science Publishing House, Beijing.

Li Y, Zhong B, 2021, Interdisciplinary Learning: Connotation, Value and Practical Path. Educational Research, 42(06): 45–53.

Liu X, 2022, Curriculum Orientation and Implementation of Interdisciplinary Learning. Curriculum, Teaching Material, Method, 42(03): 78–85.

Yu W, 2017, Core Competency-Oriented Classroom Teaching. Shanghai Education Press, Shanghai.

Zhang F, 2020, From Project-Based Learning to Interdisciplinary Teaching. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2020(08): 52–58.

Gu L, 2011, Paradigm Innovation in Teachers’ Professional Development. Global Education, 40(01): 32-39.

Zhu Y, 2019, On Teacher Growth in New Education. People’s Education Press, Beijing.

Pu S, 2026, HPM and Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Development, thesis, East China Normal University.

Li X, Tang Q, 2017, Practical Exploration of Cultivating “Academic Teachers” — Taking “Tangqin” History Master Teachers’ Studio as an Example. Research and Review in Education, 2017(4): 4.

Yu L, 2025, Interest, Need, Emotion: Ignite the “New Engine” of Expression.Life Education, 2025(29): 98–101.

Zhou H, Yan Y, 2011, Moral Education Promoted Regionally: Thinking and Practice of “Ji Chunhua Master Teachers’ Studio”. Teachers’ Companion, 2011(7): 2.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue