Research on the Impact of Certification-Related Reforms on Students’ Abilities Based on the Regression Discontinuity Design

© 2024 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Download PDF

Cite

XML

HTML

Abstract

Based on the survey data of international economics and trade majors in Guangzhou City University of Technology, this paper uses regression discontinuity design (RDD) to select indicators such as teamwork, business knowledge, analysis and technology to conduct a comprehensive survey on IACBE certification and a series of teaching reforms. According to the research, professional certification and a series of teaching reforms have a significant impact on the effect of students’ practice. In the future, attention should be paid to teaching team building, students’ teamwork ability and the application of new technology to make higher education better adapt to the changing business needs.

References

Hayward FM, 2006, Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Higher Education in Africa. Conference on Higher Education Reform in Francophone Africa: Understanding the Keys of Success, 13–15.

Chedrawi C, Tarhini A, Howayeck P, 2019, CSR and Legitimacy in Higher Education Accreditation Programs: An Isomorphic Approach of Lebanese Business Schools. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(1): 70–81.

ASIC, 2020, International Schools Accreditation, visited on April 21, 2021, https://www.asicuk.com/schools-accredita-tion/.

Cognia, 2020, Cognia Homepage, visited on April 21, 2021, https://www.cognia.org.

CIS, 2020, International Accreditation, visited April 21, 2021, https://www.cois.org/for-schools/international-accred-itation.

Mo JQ, Ulmet T, 2019, The Origin of NCCT International School Accreditation in China. Journal of Research in International Education, 18(1): 42–59.

Meuret D, Morlaix S, 2003, Conditions of Success of a School’s Self-Evaluation: Some Lessons of a European Experience. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(1): 53–71.

Sziegat H, 2021, The Response of German Business Schools to International Accreditation in Global Competition. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(2/3): 135–150.

Trapnell JE, 2007, AACSB International Accreditation: The Value Proposition and a Look to the Future. Journal of Management Development, 26(1): 67–72.

Bernasconi A, 2006, Current Trends in the Accreditation of K-12 Schools: Cases in the United States, Australia, and Canada. The Journal of Education, 185(3): 73–82.

Ehren MC, Honingh M, Hooge EH, O’Hara J, 2015, Changing School Board Governance in Primary Education Through School Inspections. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44: 205–223.

Fertig M, 2007, International School Accreditation: Between a Rock and a Hard Place? Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3): 333–348.

Oldham J, 2018, K-12 Accreditation’s Next Move: A Storied Guarantee Looks to Accountability 2.0. Education Next, 18(1): 24–30.

Coutet K, 2022, International School Accreditation: An Isomorphic Force Against Creativity in a Growing Competitive Market. Journal of Research in International Education, 21(2): 105–122.

Malau-Aduli BS, Roche P, Adu M, et al., 2020, Perceptions and Processes Influencing the Transition of Medical Students from Pre-clinical to Clinical Training. Journal of BMC Medical Education, 20: 279.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue