ARTICLE
Volume 8,Issue 7
31 December 2025
Research on Improving the Quality of Ideological and Political Smart Classrooms from the Perspective of Interaction Ritual Chain
Yi Pang
Show Less
1
Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, China,
erd 2025 , 7(12), 133–138;
https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v7i12.13525
© 2025 by the Authors. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract
In promoting the digital and intelligent transformation of ideological and political education, smart classrooms face the problem of declining teaching quality caused by technology. Existing research mostly focuses on technological innovation while ignoring ritual disruption in teaching. Based on the interaction ritual chain theory, this paper analyzes problems in scenarios, emotions, focuses, and symbols, and proposes improvement paths from four dimensions: teaching field, emotional energy, students’ attention, and symbol system. It aims to bridge the gap between technology and values and assist the high-quality development of ideological and political education.
References
Liu B, 2023, Smart Classrooms Leading the Digital Transformation of Teaching: Trends, Characteristics and Practical Strategies. E-education Research, 44(8): 71–79.
Deng X, 2020, The Obscured Emotional Dimension: An Interpretation of Randall Collins’ Interaction Ritual Chain Theory. Journalism Research, (8): 40–47 + 95.
Sterchele D, 2020, Memorable Tourism Experiences and Their Consequences: An Interaction Ritual (IR) Theory Approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 81: 102847.
Li C, 2011, An Analysis of Lefebvre’s Theory of Spatial Production. Journal of Humanities, (1): 62–68.
Collins R, 2012, Interaction Ritual Chains. The Commercial Press, Beijing.
Durkheim E, 1995, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Free Press, New York.
Liu X, 2018, Enlightenments of Interaction Ritual Chain Theory on Youth Value Cultivation. China Youth Study, (6): 99–104 + 52.
Cottingham M, 2012, Interaction Ritual Theory and Sports Fans: Emotion, Symbols, and Solidarity. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29(2): 168–185.
Collins R, 2022, Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 49.
Giddens A, The Consequences of Modernity (Revised Edition). Yilin Press, Nanjing, 23.
Meng L, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, et al., 2022, Understanding Interaction Rituals: The Impact of Interaction Ritual Chains of the Live Broadcast on People’s Wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 1041059.
Luo P, 2020, Research on the Emotional Interaction and Communication of Online Thematic Education from the Perspective of Interaction Ritual Chain. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, (11): 65–72.
Okazaki S, Muraoka Y, Osu R, 2019, Teacher-Learner Interaction Quantifies Scaffolding Behaviour in Imitation Learning. Scientific Reports, (1): 7543.
Liu Y, Liu L, 2024, Practical Paths of Emotional Empowerment in Ideological and Political Courses in Colleges and Universities. School Party Building and Ideological Education, (17): 83–85.
Gao X, Luo L, 2023, The Internal Logic, Value Implication and Practical Approach of Integrating Ritual Education into the Construction of “Great Ideological and Political Courses”. Studies in Ideological Education, (1): 103–108.
Share
Back to top
Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.
We are committed to supporting the scientific community by publishing impactful research and fostering effective communication among scientists. We continuously seek ways to accelerate scientific progress while upholding transparency and open dialogue. Our goal is to make knowledge freely and barrier‑free accessible to all.
Contact us: info@bbwpublisher.com
Level 10, 50 Clarence Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia